How we assure quality

A degree is a statement about a person. This page shows how we make sure each statement is true: the standards we set, the checks we run and the records we keep.

The test we set ourselves

Three questions we must be able to answer for every graduate

  1. Who was assessed?

    The registered student, confirmed by an identity check before each assessment.

  2. What did they show?

    A result against the published learning outcomes of a course, earned in a test or in a course they studied.

  3. Where is the record?

    In a log that keeps each result with its date and its evidence, and that anyone holding the certificate can check.

The quality cycle

Five steps, repeated for every course

  1. Set the standard

    Each course has written learning outcomes, a credit value and a pass mark, published before anyone enrols.

  2. Build the course

    Lessons, cases and workplace tasks are written to those outcomes and reviewed by a person before publication.

  3. Assess

    Every grade comes from an assessment taken by the student. No grade is entered without one.

  4. Audit

    A sample of assessment decisions is examined every month, and the findings are signed by a senior officer.

  5. Improve

    Audit findings, appeals, complaints and student feedback lead to changes, and each change is recorded.

Academic standards

The numbers behind a degree

The same numbers appear in the catalog, on every transcript and in the transcript guide.

  • Credit hourOne credit hour represents about 45 hours of learning in total.
  • CourseEach course carries 3 credit hours, about 135 hours of learning.
  • Bachelor's degree120 credit hours, which is 40 courses.
  • GradesA 90 to 100, B 80 to 89, C 70 to 79, D 60 to 69, worth 4, 3, 2 and 1 grade points.
  • Pass marks60% for a course you studied. 70% for a course claimed through an experience test.
  • ExperienceAt most 70% of a bachelor's degree can be met through assessed experience. The graduation project is always completed with the University.
  • GraduationA cumulative grade point average of at least 2.00 on a 4.00 scale.
  • Academic standing3.50 to 4.00 Excellent. 3.00 to 3.49 Very good. 2.00 to 2.99 Good.

The academic catalog →

Assessment integrity

How a test is protected

  • Identity first

    The student's identity is checked before the assessment opens.

  • A different paper each time

    Questions are drawn at random from a bank written for each course, so two students do not sit the same paper.

  • A fixed time

    Each assessment runs against a clock that the student sees throughout.

  • The result is the grade

    A grade is calculated from the result. Any correction needs a name and a written reason, and stays on the record.

  • A monthly audit

    A sample of results and of experience decisions is re-examined every month against the evidence.

  • A right of appeal

    Any result can be appealed, and every appeal is decided by a person. How to appeal.

Records

What we write down, and never rewrite

  • Every assessment, result, review and appeal is logged with its date. Entries are added to the log. They are not edited or removed.
  • Each grade keeps its source: the assessment it came from and the evidence behind it.
  • Study plans are versioned. A change to a plan carries the name of the person who approved it and the reason.
  • A certificate or transcript is issued only when every requirement on the record is met. If something is missing, the system shows what is missing instead of a document.
  • Every document carries a number, a verification code and a QR code, and each check on the verification page is recorded.
  • The University never issues a grade, a date or a pass that did not happen.
AI and people

Where we use AI, and who answers for it

We say plainly where AI works for us. Accreditors, employers and students are entitled to know.

AI helps to

  • Read the documents an applicant submits
  • Suggest how experience maps to courses
  • Give coaching feedback on practice work, through the study assistant
  • Mark assessments and prepare reports, through a separate marking tool
  • Draft course material for human review

A person always

  • Reviews course material before it is published
  • Signs the monthly audit of decisions
  • Decides every appeal and every complaint
  • Answers for each degree the University awards
Where we stand

What is published, what is built in, and what comes next

We would rather show an honest list than a finished-looking one.

Part of the quality systemStatusWhat it means
University policiesPublishedAssessment, grading, integrity, appeals, equal opportunity, accessibility, privacy and refunds are on this site. Read them.
Academic catalogPublishedEach edition carries a number and a date. Open the catalog.
Accreditation statementPublishedWhere the University stands, in plain words. Read it.
Assessment log and monthly auditBuilt into the platformThey operate from the first enrolment on the University's learning platform.
Identity check, question bank and timerBuilt into the platformPart of every assessment.
Document verificationBuilt into the platformEvery certificate and transcript can be checked online.
Student feedback after each courseBuilt into the platformA short form at the end of every course. Results go to the yearly review.
Academic committeeBeing formedIt will review each curriculum once a year. Its members will be named on this page when it is appointed.
Annual quality reportPlannedPublished on this page after the first full year of operation, with audit findings and the changes made.
External accreditationIn preparationProgram by program. Each outcome is announced on the day it is granted, and never before.
Related

Our path to international accreditation

Where we stand today, the three stages ahead, and where each announcement will appear.

Quality and accreditation →